There’s a story behind this ivy. In the fall of two years ago, I took one of Bonnie’s planters from the front yard that she was repurposing and emptied the soil in the woods behind our house. This small ivy plant clinging to life in the pot survived for two years and has now spread about three feet from the original place where I dumped it.
When watching and listening to coverage of the many natural disasters this nation has faced in recent years, most victims express their determination to rebuild and demonstrate resilience, which is a positive trait.
I acknowledge and appreciate the victim’s pain and suffering, their strength and determination and how, after such a tragic loss, they just want things to be ‘normal’ again. However, I believe there comes a point where resilience to “get back to normal” can become counterproductive.
Climate change has altered the patterns of traditional weather trends. We are increasingly experiencing what were once considered 100- and 1,000-year weather events regularly. Ice continues to melt at the poles, leading to rising ocean levels. Storms are becoming stronger and more frequent, while droughts and wildfires are no longer seasonal occurrences but happen year-round over an ever-widening area.
Healthy resilience should include the ability to adapt. If you rebuild the same house in the same location, prone to storms, floods, or fires, you will likely lose it again at some point. Is it any wonder why insurance companies won’t accept the risk? We think we can bend nature to our will, but on a grander scale, not so much. It is a kind of insanity: doing the same thing repeatedly while expecting different results.
My wife and I were discussing just this recently. It’s a difficult thing to deal with, the repeated destruction, but, like you say, what did you think was going to happen. Seems like it’s again and again these days. But what do you do? And how to compensate people? Tough issues. And yet there are still climate change deniers.
Flood insurance is cheap if you don’t need it.