Comments on: Photography: It’s historic http://meanderingpassage.com/2008/09/30/photography-its-historic/ Life is seldom simple so we must make sense of the twist and turns Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:18:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Earl Moore http://meanderingpassage.com/2008/09/30/photography-its-historic/comment-page-1/#comment-25975 Earl Moore Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:03:51 +0000 http://meanderingpassage.com/2008/09/30/photography-its-historic/#comment-25975 Paul, Any time.. Paul, Any time..

]]> By: Paul http://meanderingpassage.com/2008/09/30/photography-its-historic/comment-page-1/#comment-25974 Paul Thu, 02 Oct 2008 11:58:17 +0000 http://meanderingpassage.com/2008/09/30/photography-its-historic/#comment-25974 I'm sure that I'd have the same thoughts. After being in DX format for several years, it would probably amaze me too. We'll have to get together and you can let me take that baby for a spin! :-) I’m sure that I’d have the same thoughts. After being in DX format for several years, it would probably amaze me too. We’ll have to get together and you can let me take that baby for a spin! :-)

]]> By: Earl Moore http://meanderingpassage.com/2008/09/30/photography-its-historic/comment-page-1/#comment-25969 Earl Moore Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:20:54 +0000 http://meanderingpassage.com/2008/09/30/photography-its-historic/#comment-25969 @Paul: Thanks about the photos! I've have a Sigma 10-20 DX lens for a while but hardly ever shoot with it. It's a slow lens (f/4-5.6) and if I remember correctly the AF is slow as well. Yeah, that Nikon 14-24mm is certainly out of my range now too. I'm still getting use to "changing gears" when it comes to lens between the D300 and D700. Mentally my baseline is still perhaps the DX D300. So when I put a 20mm lens on the FX D700 it's like "WOW, look how wide that is"...don't know if that makes sense or not? ;-) @Paul: Thanks about the photos!

I’ve have a Sigma 10-20 DX lens for a while but hardly ever shoot with it. It’s a slow lens (f/4-5.6) and if I remember correctly the AF is slow as well. Yeah, that Nikon 14-24mm is certainly out of my range now too.

I’m still getting use to “changing gears” when it comes to lens between the D300 and D700. Mentally my baseline is still perhaps the DX D300. So when I put a 20mm lens on the FX D700 it’s like “WOW, look how wide that is”…don’t know if that makes sense or not? ;-)

]]> By: Paul http://meanderingpassage.com/2008/09/30/photography-its-historic/comment-page-1/#comment-25968 Paul Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:52:39 +0000 http://meanderingpassage.com/2008/09/30/photography-its-historic/#comment-25968 OK, let's try this again. I posted a comment but MySql freaked and it didn't get saved. What I said was that I really liked that picture with the cannon, actually like all of them. I can certainly see the advantages of having both formats, to be sure. I have an 11-18mm Tamron, so I can get just a touch wider than 20mm, which is just fine by me, besides, I couldn't afford the new Nikon 14-24mm! Keep those write-ups coming. I like them! Looks like I'll change my walking location to the historic part of Summerville today. You've made me want to photograph it! :-) OK, let’s try this again. I posted a comment but MySql freaked and it didn’t get saved. What I said was that I really liked that picture with the cannon, actually like all of them.

I can certainly see the advantages of having both formats, to be sure. I have an 11-18mm Tamron, so I can get just a touch wider than 20mm, which is just fine by me, besides, I couldn’t afford the new Nikon 14-24mm!

Keep those write-ups coming. I like them! Looks like I’ll change my walking location to the historic part of Summerville today. You’ve made me want to photograph it! :-)

]]>