June 2007

Most people do not have adequate back-up strategies for the data on their home computers.  For most of my computer usage life I didn’t either and have lost irreplaceable data because of it. 

This year I’ve been working to improve this situation.

What’s Important To You?:

First, you have to identify and prioritize the important data on your computer.  What would you miss if it was all lost?  Now, If after thinking about this you can’t come up with anything, then your done.  Nice job!

However, for me there are things I don’t want to lose.  I’ve listed my main “keeper” categories below, if they’re replaceable, and other related information about their storage or replacement requirements:

1. Digital Photos - Irreplaceable - Due to their size and volume most are not stored on any other media (CD’s or DVD’s).
2. Personal documents, papers and communications - Many replaceable, some not - It would require must work to recreate this data. Some I could not recreate.
3. Digital Audio and Video - Most are replaceable - There would be substantial cost in time and money in replacing this data.

What Do You Need To Protect Against:

Second, you must understand the many tragedies that could result in the lost of data.

1. Hardware failures:  Hard drives fail!  They grow old and fail or they can fail while still new.  Sometimes when they fail you can get your data off them and sometimes you can’t.  Other hardware such as drive controllers or computer components can fail as well resulting in at the least your data being unavailable until repairs are made.  Electrical storms or power line spikes and surges can lead to failures so be sure and protect your valuable equipment with surge protectors and/or UPS’s.

I’ve lost some irreplaceable digital photos to a hard drive failure, so I know how terrible that situation can be.

2. Theft:  Homes are broken into all the time.  In these burglaries the most stolen items are most often electronic components.  They’re easy to turn into cash.  Say you back up regularly on a external USB drive and arrive home to fine both your computer and USB drive are missing.  You data is probably gone for good.

3. Natural Disasters:  Home fires can result in the total lost of you equipment and data.  Also, depending upon what part of the country you live, in you may have to deal with hurricanes, tornados, flooding and earthquakes.  Any or all of these natural disasters can strike and destroy your equipment and data.

How Far Are You Willing To Go:

Once you decide what’s really important to you you can calculate how much storage space you’ll need..  It may only be a matter of having a regular schedule for burning the data to CD or DVD’s and storing them in a bank vault.  However, if the data amount is large, or you want to back it up more often, you may need to find other methods.

There’s always going to be a balance between how important the data is and how much it’ll cost in either time or money to safeguard it.  That’s a personal call that you’ll have to make.

My Back-Up Strategies:

You may think that my back-up efforts are over the top for most home users, but after the hard drive crash where I lost some irreplaceable photos I swore to never let it happen again.

The two main strategies I use are:

• back-up and then back-up the back-up; and
• make it as automatic as possible so I can’t get lazy or forget to do it.

I have a home network which consist of a main computer, three secondary computers, and a laptop.  This network also includes a Network Assess Storage (NAS) device with RAID protected online storage.  The network is a gigabit ethernet network with 802.11b/g/n wireless access.

My main computer and the critical data on the network is backed up via a number of auto-scheduled jobs (see back-up diagram below).  The back-up applications I use include “SuperDuper“, “Chronosync” and the Mozy client for Internet back-up.  Most of these jobs run daily or as required depending upon when objects change or are added.  All the back-up are “smart-backups”, meaning they only save the changed or new objects.  I use “Chronosync” to backup selected folders on HD02 instead of the whole harddrive. 

The backup of photos and critical personal documents to the Internet via Mozy is protection in case of thief or a natural disaster.  The cost for Mozy is $4.95 per month with unlimited storage.  Currently I’m only using this to back-up photos and documents.

By having my photos and the Adobe Photoshop Lightroom dB on my main computer I get great performance when I do digital photo work.  By having the photo’s and dB backed up to the NAS device each night, all the other computers on the network have access to the photos without me having to share my local drive. 

As far as the secondary computers on the network, they are backed up to the NAS device on the last week of each month using “SuperDuper”  and my laptop is backed up to an external firewire hard drive also using “SuperDuper.”

Do What’s Right For You:

There’s no right or wrong answer in how you back up your data.  Just be sure that you do.  You have to find the method that fits.  One that you can use and not forget.

The solution above does what I need without me having to manage it on a daily basis.  For me, that’s the best way to ensure it happens! 

Technorati Tags: chronosync, data, mozy, apple, backup, superduper, os+x, mac

I was feeling over-whelmed by the number of feeds I was trying to read, so this past week I went through my subscriptions and reduced the total number by 38%. That amounted to eliminating about 200 feeds.  This reduction of numbers was my first step in trying to gain control again.

Second, I arranged my general blog feeds in groups that make it easier to read those I deem most important.  I created three groups:

Group 1 - Those blogs that I read the most and wish to keep close tabs on.  I will read all of these posts.;
Group 2 - Those blogs that I often find enjoyable but don’t feel I have to read every post in depth (I scan these post and read the ones that catch my attention); and
Group 3 - Those blogs that I will consider as I have time.  If there is no time these are the first I mark all-read without reading them.

Initially the placement of feeds in the above groups was totally subjective.  But, I’m working on a grading method to allow the promotion of good blogs from Group 3 to Group 2 and to Group 1 over a period of time.  I would also like to be able to demote poor blogs.  I don’t have all the details of this worked out yet. 

Third, I’ve set up special topic groups such as “Apple Related”, “Political”, “Computer Hardware”, “Computer Software”, “World News”, etc. to allow me to focus my reading interest quickly on related feeds.  Related feeds were placed into these groups and it  allows quick marking of similar feeds as “all-read” if I don’t have time or interest to review them at the moment.

Have a special topic group works especially well for one special group I’ve set up called the “Maximum Post Group.”  This group includes those sites who do 20 or more posts per day.  I’m sure you can name a few I’ve included in this group.  I didn’t want to unsubscribe from these sites because I enjoy browsing them when I have time.  But, when they publish so many posts I can’t always keep up with them every day.  So when I open my reader and this group says for example 300+ new posts…they’ll get marked “all-read” without me ever looking back!

So far these simple changes have made it much easier to manage my feed subscriptions.  I don’t feel as overwhelmed and I believe i’m more focused on those topics that are of the highest interest to me.

As a side note, I use NetNewsWire as my main subscription feed reader. 

Technorati Tags: feeds, netnewswire, subscription+feeds

Apple released OS X Security Update 2007-006 today as a 5.3 MB update.

Security Update 2007-006 is recommended for all users and improves the security of the following component:

WebKit

For detailed information on this update, please visit this website:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=61798

Technorati Tags: apple, os+x, security, updates

Well, we can all sleep better tonight.  Microsoft Windows Vista is being proclaimed more secure than Linux and Mac OS X by Jeff Jones, security strategy director in Microsoft’s Trustworthy Computing Group. Jeff released a report on June 21, the six month anniversary of the operating system’s November release, praising Vista’s track record.

eWeek - MS: Vista More Secure than Linux, Mac OS X - Lisa Vaas: In the report, which will be released on Jones’ blog, Jones compares the number of vulnerabilities of critical, medium and low severity that have been discovered in Vista with those found in Windows XP, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Workstation, Ubuntu 6.06 LTS, Ubuntu 6.06 LTS—Reduced Component Set, Novell SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10.8, Novell SLED 10—Reduced Component Set and Apple Mac OS X v10.4.

Jeff’s feeling pretty secure because according to his count Vista is well ahead of the other OS’s.

I hope he’s right.  However, it’s going to take longer then six months to be comfortable with the words Windows and Security in the same sentence without the words “lack of” falling in there somewhere.

From the time that I’ve played with Vista you have to turn some of the “security” off to make it usable, else it hounds you constantly.

Technorati Tags: vista, linux, os+x, apple, microsoft+vista